Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.05 22:10:20 -
[1] - Quote
Until now I've never put time into playing Eve. Sure back in the day I dipped my toe into the water with the old trial account but other commitments kept me from playing it for more than a short while. The one thing I did do ' back then' was read up on the forums. That was a bit of entertainment all on its own. Epic multi page threads on a myriad of subjects. Corporate intrigue, alliance warfare, double crosses, pirate action, gank fests, and scams all could be found. Most if not all were colorfully written posts with witty responses and many had counter posts also.
Things arent so busy for me now. With that I've got time to play this game. Remembering how much fun I had reading the forums I'd search em out while at lunch or on break. There's just no describing how disappointed I'm am . These days the forums seem so.....well to put it mildly ...bland. There's no flavor anymore. There's no real drama. Everyone is so ...civil. Seriously it makes no sense considering the idea of 'civility' ,particularly in this game , goes out the window as soon as you undock. I'm not talking RL racists, social or sexists comments. Just the good old fashion flames or posts sticking it to this weeks number one bad guy.
Now let me makes this abundantly clear I am in NO way questioning the rules on what can and can't be posted here on the Eve forums. It's thier space and their rules. Same for the moderators. You guys either get paid or volunteer to enforce the rules. That's all good by me.
That said , I can't believe that the complete win that was once in the forums just died. I thinks it's moved on to another place that wasn't so 'structured'. My question is ..where?
Respond here but if it's rule breaking then send me some info via email.
Thanks
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.05 22:35:30 -
[2] - Quote
I see So it went the way of less 'structured' figuratively and literally.
Can't say I blame you about being dismayed. Thanks for the info all the same. |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 01:19:18 -
[3] - Quote
Id like to keep this discussion honest but constructive. Let's not turn this into bash the mods.
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 01:34:52 -
[4] - Quote
Ok now I'm keenly interested in this. You're saying that Eve representatives respond to post subjects written on Reddit that have been summarily deleted or locked on their own forums? There's no end to the irony on that . |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 02:33:42 -
[5] - Quote
Can anyone else corroborate on this? Also if this is true why aren't DEVs reevaluating how they handle issues like it ? |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 02:54:47 -
[6] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote:Also if this is true why aren't DEVs reevaluating how they handle issues like it ? That's funny. Don't take my word for it, though. There are numerous examples that others would probably bo only too happy to share... albeit, briefly.
I'm just asking for additional sources. Nothing was implied. I'm considering putting up money for an Omega account. However, if I have legitimate issues, post my concerns on the forums, and be punished for it, what incentive is there handing CCP my money? |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 03:32:59 -
[7] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote:Also if this is true why aren't DEVs reevaluating how they handle issues like it ? That's funny. Don't take my word for it, though. There are numerous examples that others would probably bo only too happy to share... albeit, briefly. I'm just asking for additional sources. Nothing was implied. I'm considering putting up money for an Omega account. However, if I have legitimate issues, post my concerns on the forums, and be punished for it, what incentive is there handing CCP my money? Forums are not where issues get sorted out. Any concern should be raised through a support ticket.
Can't disagree with you there. |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 03:33:57 -
[8] - Quote
Sweet Adamas wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote:Id like to keep this discussion honest but constructive. Let's not turn this into bash the mods.
quite a few years ago these forums were nothing but fun. Nullsec alliances used to go to war in nullsec and on GD. The epic thread posts were epic. 1. Remember when mintchiplol was made a Dev. 2. Remember the Mittans thread when he was banned for a silly drunken statement. 3. I remember when someone posted pics of CCP punky as a Zombie and everyone laughed along including her. 4. When the character portraits changed and a epic gay character thread rolled through GD 5. Trolling was funny and corps went to war over it 6. No one really insulted the Devs and they rolled with it None of this would happen today
Going back to my earlier comment - your post is spot on. That's the kind of stuff I remember seeing |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 11:40:17 -
[9] - Quote
Neuntausend wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote:I'm just asking for additional sources. Nothing was implied. I'm considering putting up money for an Omega account. However, if I have legitimate issues, post my concerns on the forums, and be punished for it, what incentive is there handing CCP my money? You won't get punished. Just ignored and silenced, read: Your thread will get locked or even deleted. If the ISDs can't find a reason to do so in your OP, they will certainly find one in the responses. Case in point: Vimsy Vortis wrote:gas ISDs Scipio Artelius wrote:Forums are not where issues get sorted out.
Any concern should be raised through a support ticket. That is true. However, a support ticket is not suited for an open discussion between players and developers. CCP has become really careful in regards to openly discussing things here on the forums, probably to avoid quotable statements that they might regret later. But for some reason, that doesn't keep them from having these discussions elsewhere (read: on reddit). Probably because they still want to stay close to their player base, and they can always claim that reddit is not "official". And if somebody gets offended by someone on reddit, it's not CCPs problem to deal with. How very convenient. It just sucks for me, because I don't like or understand reddit with its funky up- and downvotes. Why can they not just put posts in order like a sane person would? I understand its 2017 and they want to make use of the wonders of modern social media and s\\t. But I kind of do not want to register and get used to a 3rd party service to get involved with the community of that game I'm playing, especially if there is a perfectly fine platform right here.
I've the same problem wi Reddit as well. There's just no order to it at all. |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 14:07:48 -
[10] - Quote
Wolfgang Jannesen wrote:Refreshing to see somebody not bitching about the game
I'm enjoying the game just fine. I do think some of the fun found in the forums is sadly missing though |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 16:15:44 -
[11] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Reddit is the worst cesspool of cancer and useless comments.
Thats not even considering the partisan up/down voting, as well as willful moderation bias.
Maybe its because Im a Finn from a different cultural background renowned for speaking only when you actually have something meaningful to say, with an abject contempt for bullcrap and empty nothings.
The forum rules here largely only require being ontopic, relevant, not to insult/disrespect others offhandedly for no purpose, and not to waste everyones time with crap. Not only are those not much to ask, they keep the board clear of trash and cancer, and is conducive to civil discourse as it is supposed to be.
Crap-posters spreading their sewage across the internet cos they think they are funny, witty, or have an opinion on everything, making pointless noise can all burn for all I care. Good riddance
I could agree with some of what you're saying but only some. True there's no place for vitriolic comments drenched in real world sexism, racism, and religious intolerance. That said I don't think you or I have power to proclaim what is and isn't funny or what is and isn't trivial or what is and isn't relevant. There's a myriad of subjects people find humorous, interesting, and compelling that I personally don't have any affinity towards. That said I don't think I've a place demanding that those topics be barred simply because I don't like them. As much as I liked what the forums were back in the day I passed by tons of posts that didn't interest me. Same can be said about many of the post today. As the old saying goes "youre either a Beatles fan or an Elvis fan but you can't be both" .
Btw my better half is Finnish American and I'm Swedish American . |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 16:30:35 -
[12] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:We aren't really talking about why anyone personally likes or dislikes something. We're talking about why one (which is external) seems to be the more alive, vibrant and popular option (not just for the players but many times for the DEVs themselves) compared to the other (this place, owned by the game company itself).
Reddit has a EVE fitting section that has no drama at all, I've gotten better fitting ideas there than I have in the Ships and Modules section of these forums. News about changes/devblogs etc forEVE pops up in ONE PLACE on Reddit, on these forums I have to hunt for them. And so on.
We can react in partisan "but Im a EVE Forum poster!" fashion or we can understand why their seems to have been a shift in preference. But we can't do both lol.
Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to me that you're suggesting that the lack of 'vibrancy' here is in some part due to players preferring Reddit over Eve forums ?
As I've stated, I'm new to playing, but aren't there specific threads on the Eve forums for topics like ship fitting?
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 16:59:43 -
[13] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:The difference is between useful content, and useless content.
Rules are there to encourage the former, and remove the latter.
Reddit boards are partisan, systemically, by Up/down voting and attacking content with crap. Unrepresentative/noncommitted moderators exhibit bias frequently.
Here, on this board, moderators are required to remain non-partisan. Rules here enforce constructive discussion.
I believe someone said that many of the moderators are also players. If true there's legitimacy in the claim that moderator bias could influence what's deemed acceptable and what's not. Of course I've no real proof that has happened just pointing that it could be possible. Given the fact that Eve has officially responded to posts made on other forums suggests that they've some issues communicating with their player base on their own moderated boards.
I appreciate your input though |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 22:19:01 -
[14] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Hey Guys  Thanks for the comments, it's nice to know there's still a sizeable amount of people who care about the health of the forums, for sure. We're actually in the middle of testing an entirely new forum system with the assistance of our Volunteer team, and we'll more than likely be looking to roll it out somewhere toward the summer  The rollout of these forums is going to include a complete rewrite of the forum rules (relaxing quite a few of them), re-organizing our forum categories and the introduction of a new mandate for ISD in terms of how moderation is carried out, as well as a few other things that the community team will be blogging about in the not too distant future (more than likely soon after Fanfest, which happens in April). The idea will be to promote more open and direct (but civil) discussion, and give the community a more relaxed place to talk about spaceships  We'll have more information in the near future <3
Thanks for the fast update Falcon ! Never would have expected such a fast response . I'll be looking out for the changes :) |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 14:37:04 -
[15] - Quote
So yeah , I start my day with a cup of coffee and check out what's new.
Save for the couple having a death match with pool toys , the comments here have been great.
With that I'm gonna slide outta da way before the "yo mamma" insults start flying |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 14:52:08 -
[16] - Quote
Jeremiah Saken wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote:With that I'm gonna slide outta da way before the "yo mamma" insults start flying F*** it Dude. Let's go bowling.
You buy the beer |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 16:18:48 -
[17] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Alrighty then.
Ill come join you on Reddit in full force.
Lets see if your claims are true. I doubt it.
Im sure my posts will be downvoted by vested interests, and posts/account deleted by pocket mods.
Lets see if your claim of freedom there pans out. What you don't understand is that wherever you go you will get the same reception, ISD'd to oblivion here or Downvoted to the same oblivion at Reddit, because your communication skills are bad and you are off-putting.
I said the same thing to my ex wife
That said I think some people aren't interested in making a point. It's worse than trolling though. Some people place more value in arguing. It doesn't matter what they argue about so long as they get to argue. I wouldn't be shocked to see if this guys posting history was filled with argumentative diatribes. |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 16:31:55 -
[18] - Quote
mkint wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Alrighty then.
Ill come join you on Reddit in full force.
Lets see if your claims are true. I doubt it.
Im sure my posts will be downvoted by vested interests, and posts/account deleted by pocket mods.
Lets see if your claim of freedom there pans out. What you don't understand is that wherever you go you will get the same reception, ISD'd to oblivion here or Downvoted to the same oblivion at Reddit, because your communication skills are bad and you are off-putting. Sorry I put you off, but thats your problem, not mine. You might want to ask yourself as to why that is. You claim Reddit offers freedom. Are you now saying that only applies to those you agree with? Does my syntax and format offend you? Are you triggered? This again just justifies my original statement on the nature of Reddit. Mass opinion up/down voting of what ypu "dont like". Where is the freedom in that? No wonder you evacuated from here, when your person and opinions are so contrived that you need an echo-chamber to support them, rather than them standing on their own with you defending them. You have the freedom to be reviled and cast out. It's not that your opinions are bad. They are, but it's not just that. It's that your bad opinions are badly presented, badly communicated, badly defended, and condescending as all get out. The only reason that's "[our] problem, not [yours]" is because it's technically not breaking any rules. If the best thing you can say about your freedom of speech is "I technically can't be imprisoned for what I'm saying" then your arguments are automatically wrong. You can say what you want (within the rules laid out) but that doesn't mean you deserve to be heard. And that's where sites like reddit have some power to improve content by making dumb people turn invisible. It's not perfect, and I'm not a reddit fan at all, but people will go to where the best content is, and that's obviously not here. Not any more.
The last sentence you wrote was the reason I made this thread. I remember a time when it was a worthwhile place. Falcons information gives me the impression it could return to that.
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 16:40:28 -
[19] - Quote
There's a guy I work with who we have nicknamed 'Google Prime' . Always had to have the last word and demanded to know all the facts. The guy could seriously get into a long winded argument with a doorknob.
Call me crazy but I'm reminded of him right now |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 18:22:27 -
[20] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Salvos, there is nothing wrong with posting like tiresome 13 year old, (when you are 13) but it is posters like you which lead to these forums being so fiercely censored.
For the good of the forums, just stop.
This |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 18:29:11 -
[21] - Quote
sero Hita wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Im not from Vulcan. Im from Finland, which is probbly the closest thing.
I read the opinions and positions here with deep concern.
Im not buying the premises stated and find them largely selfmotivated for personal gain, as well of censoring of what they dont like.
Ill join you on reddit and you will no doubt identify me promplty, down vote what I say that you dont like, and pressure mods to remove me.
It was claimed that reddit offers more freedom than here. Lets see if that is true. well, at least you go in with positive mindset, so what can go wrong? No self-fullfilling prophecies here.... I will prove they will downvote me...
Just had this vision -
" I'm telling you those people don't want me at the party" 15 minutes later the guy get tossed out after taking a dump on the homeowners kitchen table "See I told you. Those people are a bunch of haters" |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 00:39:18 -
[22] - Quote
Hir Miriel wrote:Reddit is a malodorous skunk hole, where the infighting for fame is extraordinarily vicious, because the prizes are so small.
If I was rethinking this forum, I'd be thinking about what people would pay for, and try to structure it that way, so that the forums can be a self-sustaining creation.
With that overall philosophy I'd look at three things, newsworthiness, fun and visual appeal.
There always tends to be one forum that people pile into.
On these forums it's probably General Discussion.
Why is that?
I call that feature, newsworthiness. It's up to date information across a spectrum of interests. A function of information and time.
So that would be important to have. A big crazy tavern of all sorts of conversation.
Next would be fun. I'd reward good posting, which I break into two groups; fun and/or informative.
Wow! Nice post, here have a fancy EVE jacket, in game or real. Or some game time, or a pile of ISK.
Then the visual stuff, we are all about graphics. Which makes sense, light is a speedy carrier of information, so we tend to rely on our eyes.
How can players create visual content for the EVE forums?
Currently linking to other places gets you a popup message warning you of the dangers of the internet and reminding you to stay in the safe arms of EVE.
So it makes it difficult to organise a ship design contest, or even make a funny gif of being podded.
That's the areas I'd look at.
And I'd take it easy on the heavy breathed marketer with the bad tie, knocking on my spaceship window.
There's a few former threads that used to be here that aren't anymore. Though I can't recall the exact title there was a thread specifically earmarked for alliance/corporate warfare. The volume of posts rivaled general. If memory serves there were multiple posts and/or posters promoting the catch phrase " there is no ( insert name ) "
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 14:03:15 -
[23] - Quote
Salvos,
You've made your position clear multiple times. We get it. You're not enthralled by Reddit and you obviously aren't happy with a great deal of the posts other people are saying here. No insult intended but you've a negative air about you. Enough to think it's intentional. I'd rather have a positive and cordial exchange. The other contributors seem to agree.
I recall you taking pride in your being Finnish and not speaking unless you've something to say. I reiterate - you've done that. The only thing you're doing now is promoting discord.
Perhaps you should create a post of your own. One that you can invite people to post things you'd like to argue about. |

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 00:32:05 -
[24] - Quote
In my view the power of a "thumbs down" vote is on par with a "thumbs up" vote. One could conceive that either one could be flooded with votes for a multidied of causes, to include things like multi boxed / multi account voting. It's very probable that it's already happened here with just the "thumbs up " vote. Up or down the votes should be taken with a grain of salt. With that we shouldn't promote the idea that those votes should influence thread popularity. If for no other reason that there's the possibility that enough egregious votes could mar any honest assessment.
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 19:30:50 -
[25] - Quote
Nana Skalski wrote:Kaleb Mynwarra wrote: In my view the power of a "thumbs down" vote is on par with a "thumbs up" vote. One could conceive that either one could be flooded with votes for a multidied of causes, to include things like multi boxed / multi account voting. It's very probable that it's already happened here with just the "thumbs up " vote. Up or down the votes should be taken with a grain of salt. With that we shouldn't promote the idea that those votes should influence thread popularity. If for no other reason that there's the possibility that enough egregious votes could mar any honest assessment.
No one really cares for likes, people have lived without them for so long. But people care for dislikes. Especially if you can bury someones post under them. And while the likes is a fun part, unlike is in a no-fun zone. Truth, if it hurts with raw logic, unpopular, but sound propositions, all may not be so popular under those conditions.
I don't disagree that people prefer approval over disapproval :p Im neither for or against the continued use of the the "thumbs up" button. The same can be said about possible inclusion of a "thumbs down".
Admittedly some people would like to see the like/dislike tally as a tool to pick what threads to read. Perhaps it could be useful in that sense.
To clarify my position. I don't mind having the like dislike option being avalable. I'm very weary of utilizing the like / dislike tally as a benchmark for post placement , based on the likely possibility that the like / dislike voting process could be tainted.
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 22:33:46 -
[26] - Quote
mkint,
My contributes to online forums outside of work have been limited these last few years. Outside of the occasional remark I really didnGÇÖt have the time to peruse let alone contribute to entertainment based online discussions. Most of my online comments were on professional based websites. Those tend to be much more ridged and very little concern is put to the popularity of a topic when the overall goal was achieving departmental deadlines. Coincidently the professional forums I use are even more severely moderated compared to this one.
Im not too sure that there is a GÇÿbestGÇÖ. GÇÿBestGÇÖ would be subjective. As I eluded in an earlier post. Things I like and dislike, find interesting and uninteresting and so forth could be the complete opposite opinion of another person. IMO the best thing we collectively can hope for is a system that contains a set of reasonable rules, enforced by objective moderation, but is primarily influenced by the using population.
ItGÇÖs reasonable to assume that the Dev team working on the new forum would have looked at other popular forums, particularly the ones that EVE players have gravitated towards. ItGÇÖs also reasonable to think theyGÇÖd be looking at whatGÇÖs being said here on their own forums.
Dev Falcon mentioned that they were in the process of formulating a new forum including a lessening/ modifying some the rules. I would hope the Dev team working on the new forums take into account some of the responses made in this thread.
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 00:28:15 -
[27] - Quote
mkint wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:To those who wish for a 'dislike' button, I assume that you have thought of some means which would prevent it being spammed, say by the goons, for example? By only putting it on sections that don't matter. So, no F&I, no dev threads, no feedback threads. Maybe not even WTB/WTS market threads. All those function fine as is. But the community sections, absolutely.
I don't see any reason why we should limit the use of a like/dislike option so long as that option has no barring on the placement of a post. Look at it simply as some sort of function that'll stoke vanity. Outside of that it's got zero effect on where, when, or for how long a post stays where it is.
Post popularity IMO shouldn't be about who clicked a button. It should be about the number of people who've read and participated in the conversations
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2017.02.12 02:54:40 -
[28] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Circumstantial Evidence wrote:On a related topic of why reddit is getting more use: Items posted to News Channels or patch notes don't have comment threads, unless the CCP poster makes a special effort to create a thread. Have you ever wanted to comment on a Scope news article? You have to go over to the EVE Fiction section to see if someone is talking about the latest item, or make your own thread. Why is this extra work required? Everything CCP publishes should have a comment section, it's ubiquitous in web design these days. The 119.2 patch notes have drawn a number of pre-release comments over on reddit, including dev replies that these forums would have benefited from. I like having a clear, concise area where they can post updates without comments so you don't have to read through the drivel. Yes, the dev replies on the EVE Reddit thread are certainly valid - but the majority of comments are just fluff.
I agree. From my perspective Reddit looks like it's one step away from anarchy
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
"For 800 years ...." - some little green man
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
20
|
Posted - 2017.02.12 16:57:50 -
[29] - Quote
mkint wrote:Neuntausend wrote: No matter how valid, well worded and respectful a post may be, all it would take to make sure it never gets seen by anyone is a handful of people who really don't like it.
The system I've seen that seems appealing (I don't use a variety of forums often enough to know how it actually plays out on behalf of the community) is the strong negative vote posts get replaced a "this post falls below the threshold, click here to expand post, click here to change settings." It's doesn't straight up vanish a post, but after reading the first by a shiptoaster you can usually figure out to not bother reading the rest. And that would be the entire point of using an up/down vote system to improve content quality. I'm not too interested in the sort order being changed. I think active threads keep the freshest content forward, where most voted threads can get stale. Maybe put some additional level of filters as well... like when Salvos (or once upon a time, Tom Gerard) inevitably gets all his posts hidden in every thread he posts in, maybe stop using his posts to bump a thread to the top.
I was weary of the votes having an effect on posts for reasons live already mentioned. That said, I can get behind this sort of action. It allows the contributors to have some say without censuring other people's opinions to oblivion.
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
"For 800 years ...." - some little green man
|

Kaleb Mynwarra
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2017.02.14 14:41:00 -
[30] - Quote
ISD Max Trix wrote:Malcanis
Followed your post till the last paragraph. Then you lost me. ISD's can not ban or mute someone on the forums. We can how ever submit to CCP (the community team) what the player did/posted. At that point CCP makes the call on a ban or mute. Now if it's bad enough (such as someone spamming porn malware etc) we can request an emergency mute from the GM team. But we better have a damn good reason to go that route because Internal Affairs will be asking. So you accusation that the ISD banned you is false on its face, your issue there is with CCP.
I'm new and even I know the capabilities of the ISD team is a bit more than that. You guys can lock and remove posts. Effectively shutting down a poster. Let's forgo the Slavos tactic of splitting of hairs and the gas lighting and stay focused on the issues. There's a consensus that the Eve forums aren't as enjoyable as before. This raised two questions : why and what can be done to rectify it.
After reading the comments here , one of the reasons that cannot be brushed aside is the unhappiness contributors of the Eve forums have with the moderation team. Not all of you, and no one has been specifically identified. However enough posts have been made that one cannot deny that there's a real feeling that the performance of the ISD team has been tainted by behaviors of inconsistency, heavy handed application of the rules, and possible biased behavior. Contributors have asked for objective and reasonable moderation. The key word being 'moderate'.
Frankly I'm a bit disappointed in both you and ISD Fractal. You both had opportunities to work with the community on ways to improve these forums. Sadly you've go the way of being defensive and excuse making. Some of the excuses aren't even good too. Honestly Fractal, calling Reddit shinny and new as the reason to why people are posting there and not here is just foolish. There's simply no sense in make that kind of remark when the Eve DEV team gravitates there to communicate with the players. That alone screams that somethings wrong here. Even a new player like myself can clearly see how off putting a comment like that is.
While we're aren't in agreement on specific ways to improve parts of these forums. We are generally interested in seeing these forums improve. I think it's safe to say we aren't against you. It's safe to say that most of us don't mind having the forums moderated.
"All right, everybody, just calm down" - Space Ghost
"For 800 years ...." - some little green man
|
|
|